Switch to full style
Use this forum to post questions relating to WinGate, feature requests, technical or configuration problems
Post a reply

Sat Downlink VPN and Nat Problem

Jun 19 07 6:25 am

When I connect the VPN, the NAT do not function.

Wingate version 6.2.1

ICS disable

Wingate NAT Enable

Interface

Public 200.164.1.100
Private 192.168.0.1
Wireless 192.168.1.2

and VPN for downlink
Name: VPN SAT

Example:

Server -> 20 clients

Win2003 Server -> Windows XP -> Other VPN clients
VPN SAT

when VPN SAT, is desconected, I obtains to connect other VPNs for the computers customers, emule, Kazaa, etc.

When I connect VPN SAT in server, do not obtain to connect others vpns for the customers, nor emule, Kazaa, etc. it does not function

traffic HTTP functions normal.

Other VPN SHOW - ERRO 800 Unable to establish VPN connection

in wingate monitor show

NAT UDP: 192.168.0.5:500 <-> 201.12.25.60:500 (Ip VPN SAT)
Ip client

when I desconect the VPN SAT, everything function normally.

Public ip is: 200.164.1.100

in Wingate NAT log:

192.168.0.5 Guest 0000000000 Created:
192.168.0.5 lanhouse 0000002166 Requested:NAT: TCP Connection to 201.12.25.2:1723
192.168.0.5 lanhouse 0000002166 Traffic 124 244 244 124 1s
192.168.0.5 lanhouse 0000002166 Terminated exit code 42
192.168.0.5 Guest 0000000000 Created:
192.168.0.5 lanhouse 0000002168 Requested: NAT: UDP 192.168.0.5:500 <-> 201.12.25.2:500

what I make to resolve the problem?

Jun 20 07 2:08 pm

If you find it challenging to communicate in English then you might want to find a distributor or reseller in your region for support in your native language: http://www.wingate.com/resellers.php


Are you saying when the actual WinGate Server connects to the remote VPN as a VPN Client, then the LAN Clients are not able to connect to the remote VPN either or any other NAT sessions at the same time? If that is the case then please try turning off "Support for Multiple Subnetworks" for the sake of testing only.

Image


If you still need assistance with this can you try and explain this problem again?
Post a reply