Dec 17 03 9:48 pm
Dec 18 03 7:59 am
Nev wrote:Hi all,
Just taking a clients machine to Wingate 5.2.0 & KAV 1.2 with new subsscription.
Dec 18 03 4:17 pm
Pascal wrote:It depends on the exact configuration in KAV. I am not 100% sure which set of circumstances will indicate to the antivirus engine that a download is corrupted, however.
You can go into the Advanced Override configuration and change it so the download will be either let through or discarded. (Discarded might be a good choice if it does not affect the operation of the site)
Another alternative is to add the URL or site to your trusted list.
Would it be possible for you to post the options you have configured for KAV to the forum ? Or email me the registry configuration so I can have a look at it, please ? It might simply be a configuration flag.Nev wrote:Hi all,
Just taking a clients machine to Wingate 5.2.0 & KAV 1.2 with new subsscription.
Dec 28 03 11:44 pm
Dec 29 03 2:17 pm
Nev wrote:http://www.dailyclassifieds.com.au/FreeGames/SuperBug/SuperBug.jar
Maybe the module should deal with this Java file as a thought.
Dec 30 03 1:33 am
Dec 30 03 1:35 am
Pascal wrote:Nev wrote:http://www.dailyclassifieds.com.au/FreeGames/SuperBug/SuperBug.jar
Maybe the module should deal with this Java file as a thought.
It's interesting that it's reported as corrupted. That is the response from the AV Engine. However, when I try it with their online virus checker (After having saved the .JAR file to my local machine) it reported everything was OK.
G'day Pascal, yes same here, can't save the file though qarantine shows it to be there and scanning it is AOK [the quarantined file that is].Pascal wrote:So, when was the last time you updated the AV definitions ? It is possible that there is a newer SDK available than the one we have, I'll check that as well. (Although the virus definition update does allow for newer scanning methods / unarchivers, etc. to be added as well)
AV defs twice daily. Most Kaspersky A/v products will report various files as corrupted at times, although this one is not doing just that at present, only when in a download stream!Pascal wrote:If you save the file to your local machine (I used wget, but should be possible if you right-click and say "Save Target As") and then scan it from GateKeeper, do you get the same response ?
Dec 30 03 1:36 am
Nev wrote:http://www.dailyclassifieds.com.au/FreeGames/SuperBug/SuperBug.jar
Maybe the module should deal with this Java file as a thought.Pascal wrote:It's interesting that it's reported as corrupted. That is the response from the AV Engine. However, when I try it with their online virus checker (After having saved the .JAR file to my local machine) it reported everything was OK.
G'day Pascal, yes same here, can't save the file though qarantine shows it to be there and scanning it is AOK [the quarantined file that is].Pascal wrote:So, when was the last time you updated the AV definitions ? It is possible that there is a newer SDK available than the one we have, I'll check that as well. (Although the virus definition update does allow for newer scanning methods / unarchivers, etc. to be added as well)
AV defs twice daily. Most Kaspersky A/v products will report various files as corrupted at times, although this one is not doing just that at present, only when in a download stream!Pascal wrote:If you save the file to your local machine (I used wget, but should be possible if you right-click and say "Save Target As") and then scan it from GateKeeper, do you get the same response ?
Dec 30 03 1:37 am
Nev wrote:http://www.dailyclassifieds.com.au/FreeGames/SuperBug/SuperBug.jar
Maybe the module should deal with this Java file as a thought.
Pascal wrote:It's interesting that it's reported as corrupted. That is the response from the AV Engine. However, when I try it with their online virus checker (After having saved the .JAR file to my local machine) it reported everything was OK.
Pascal wrote:So, when was the last time you updated the AV definitions ? It is possible that there is a newer SDK available than the one we have, I'll check that as well. (Although the virus definition update does allow for newer scanning methods / unarchivers, etc. to be added as well)
Pascal wrote:If you save the file to your local machine (I used wget, but should be possible if you right-click and say "Save Target As") and then scan it from GateKeeper, do you get the same response ?