WinGate 6.1 - Checksum failure

Use this forum to post questions relating to WinGate, feature requests, technical or configuration problems

Moderator: Qbik Staff

WinGate 6.1 - Checksum failure

Postby CatMix » Nov 19 05 2:04 am

W2k SP4, WG 6.1, KAV 2.0
Ethernet Intel PRO/100+, LinkSys WAG54G (ADSL gateway) //MTU 1500

In Firewall it is a lot of messages Checksum failure. What it can be? It is possible-whether to disable somehow this check if there is no decision?
CatMix
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Nov 02 05 8:34 pm
Location: Russia, St. Peterburg

Postby adrien » Nov 22 05 11:01 am

Hi

In these packets, what is the protocol and destination port?

Are these packets coming from your LAN, or from the Internet?

Adrien
adrien
Qbik Staff
 
Posts: 5448
Joined: Sep 03 03 2:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby CatMix » Nov 22 05 9:32 pm

adrien wrote:Hi

In these packets, what is the protocol and destination port?

Are these packets coming from your LAN, or from the Internet?

Adrien


Checksum failure packets coming only from Internet.
From 80, 443, 110, 53 (TCP/UDP), 21 ports.
CatMix
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Nov 02 05 8:34 pm
Location: Russia, St. Peterburg

Re: WinGate 6.1 - Checksum failure

Postby xwray » Nov 23 05 3:33 am

CatMix wrote:W2k SP4, WG 6.1, KAV 2.0
Ethernet Intel PRO/100+, LinkSys WAG54G (ADSL gateway) //MTU 1500

In Firewall it is a lot of messages Checksum failure. What it can be? It is possible-whether to disable somehow this check if there is no decision?



I occasionally get the same message...mostly coming in on on port 80. My guess is that jerks are trying to get into your system and compromise it.
<Smith & Wesson...the original point and click interface>
xwray
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 21 05 12:03 pm

Re: WinGate 6.1 - Checksum failure

Postby CatMix » Nov 23 05 9:18 pm

xwray wrote:
CatMix wrote:W2k SP4, WG 6.1, KAV 2.0
Ethernet Intel PRO/100+, LinkSys WAG54G (ADSL gateway) //MTU 1500

In Firewall it is a lot of messages Checksum failure. What it can be? It is possible-whether to disable somehow this check if there is no decision?



I occasionally get the same message...mostly coming in on on port 80. My guess is that jerks are trying to get into your system and compromise it.


It appears from sites on which inquiries have gone.
CatMix
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Nov 02 05 8:34 pm
Location: Russia, St. Peterburg

Postby adrien » Nov 24 05 1:27 am

Hi

Can you tell me what is in the flags column for these packets? You may need to enable viewing that column - right-click on the firewall window, choose "select columns", and select flags.

Most likely these are late RST packets coming in on a previously closed connection.

Adrien
adrien
Qbik Staff
 
Posts: 5448
Joined: Sep 03 03 2:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby CatMix » Nov 24 05 4:57 am

adrien wrote:Hi

Can you tell me what is in the flags column for these packets? You may need to enable viewing that column - right-click on the firewall window, choose "select columns", and select flags.

Most likely these are late RST packets coming in on a previously closed connection.

Adrien


A ~ 75%
AP ~ 15%
FAP ~ 3%
null ~ 7% (only UDP)

It is especially appreciable in time downloadings of files, checksum failure falls constantly. I have specially put Intel PRO/100 + with the hardware flow control of frames.
It is not trusted that frames really bad.
CatMix
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Nov 02 05 8:34 pm
Location: Russia, St. Peterburg

Postby xwray » Nov 25 05 8:22 am

In my case the flags were either A, S, or in a few cases SA. What do the flags indicate? It also looks like the majority of the IPs that were trying to get in were located in China.
<Smith & Wesson...the original point and click interface>
xwray
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 21 05 12:03 pm

Postby adrien » Nov 25 05 9:37 am

S = SYN (synchronise - used to set up the connection in the first place)
A = ACK (acknowledge - used to acknowledge data sent by the other end)
F = FIN (Finish - used to close the connection)
R = RST (Reset - used to hard-close / terminate brutally the connection)
P = PSH (Push - used to indicate that the data should be pushed to the application)

Do you have Checksum offloading enabled on your network adapter?

Adrien
adrien
Qbik Staff
 
Posts: 5448
Joined: Sep 03 03 2:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby xwray » Nov 25 05 4:41 pm

It doesn't appear that this card (IBM Netfinity10/100) has such a setting, at least it doesn't appear under the card's properties.
<Smith & Wesson...the original point and click interface>
xwray
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 21 05 12:03 pm

Postby CatMix » Nov 25 05 11:21 pm

adrien wrote:Do you have Checksum offloading enabled on your network adapter?

Adrien


I not see checkbox TCP Checksum Offload. I don't know checksum offloading enabled by default.

http://www.intel.com/network/connectivi ... dapter.htm
CatMix
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Nov 02 05 8:34 pm
Location: Russia, St. Peterburg

Postby xwray » Dec 01 05 5:15 am

Hi...it doesn't seem to me that this question was ever finally answered...is it now considered a dead issue? I would still like to understand what the checksum error actually means - is it a result of a penetration attempt or is it a hardware or software problem?

thanks
<Smith & Wesson...the original point and click interface>
xwray
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 21 05 12:03 pm

Postby adrien » Dec 01 05 7:50 am

Basically it means that the packets were dropped due to having a bad checksum.

This can happen if the packet was corrupted in transit, or sent incorrectly, or in some cases where there may be an intermediate NDIS driver in your network stack that is messing with the checksums.

If received on the wire with a bad checksum, the rule is to drop the packet. We always did this before, but I figured we shouldn't drop packets without some notification, so I added the notification into 6.1

If there is some piece of software on your system that is breaking checksums, then that could cause good packets to be dropped. It is always possible there is some sort of exploit attempt being made as well.

Are you getting any complaints of people not being able to connect to you?
adrien
Qbik Staff
 
Posts: 5448
Joined: Sep 03 03 2:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby xwray » Dec 01 05 9:04 am

No complaints nor do I see anything untoward. I probably won't see more than a dozen such messages in a 24 hour period and almost always on port 80 from an IP most always in china. I would imagine if I had a software or hardware issue I would be seeing a lot more....

thanks
<Smith & Wesson...the original point and click interface>
xwray
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 21 05 12:03 pm

Postby genie » Dec 02 05 10:13 am

WIngate behaviour changed a bit with 6.1 in regard to handling checksum failures - before 6.1 Wingate simply dropped the packets while in 6.1 it started reporting them - that's why it shows all these "Incorrect checksum" hits. If the number of dropped packets is low, there is nothing to worry about. If it becomes a stream of errors, then it is either a hardware fault somewhere on the line (interference) or it might indicate an attempt to attack the server.
genie
Qbik Staff
 
Posts: 1788
Joined: Sep 30 03 10:29 am

Postby CatMix » Dec 02 05 11:34 pm

adrien wrote:Basically it means that the packets were dropped due to having a bad checksum.

This can happen if the packet was corrupted in transit, or sent incorrectly, or in some cases where there may be an intermediate NDIS driver in your network stack that is messing with the checksums.

If received on the wire with a bad checksum, the rule is to drop the packet. We always did this before, but I figured we shouldn't drop packets without some notification, so I added the notification into 6.1

If there is some piece of software on your system that is breaking checksums, then that could cause good packets to be dropped. It is always possible there is some sort of exploit attempt being made as well.

Are you getting any complaints of people not being able to connect to you?


It is good idea, but you could add item in menu Firewall to not show checksum failure?

Clear All
Copy to Clipboard
Edit Columns
* Show Checksum Failure

Thanks.
CatMix
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Nov 02 05 8:34 pm
Location: Russia, St. Peterburg


Return to WinGate

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests