Moderator: Qbik Staff
Thank you for the reply, i have 2 NICS and both are going to 2 different fireall/routers should i have a 3rd NIC? I have 1 DSL and 1 T1 and the dsl nic is .11 and the t1 is .12.
I tried the same thing you did and Guest trys to conect for me when i specified port 81 and because my guest account is A) disable and B) has no rights to anything. I have set the Service to all everyone, just my account and nothing seems to work. if you'd like i can sent you screen shots of what i'm seeing if this is not making sense.
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : proxy
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : DOMAIN.com
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : DOMAIN.com
Ethernet adapter X.X.0.11:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Net Adapter
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : MAC
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : X.X.0.11
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.254.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : X.X.1.12
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 4.2.2.1
4.2.2.2
65.106.1.196
65.106.7.196
Ethernet adapter X.X.0.12:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Net Adapter
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : MAC
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : X.X.0.12
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.254.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : X.X.1.17
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.6.1.218
4.2.2.2
4.2.2.1
Why would i need to do that now when everything worked just fine on 5.23?
Also i cannot enable the guest account because when people try to access the internet even if it is set that they need to authenticate, the guest user will be used.
so have everyone set to "User must be authenticated" and the default rights set to "MUST also be granted" that would force everyone to authenticate?
And i can leave the guest use enable.
does that change anything?
Also what is the filter of 192.168.0. suppose to do?
is there a way to have the SOCKS service refer to the WWW service like it did in 5.23
and my mapping problem still doesn't work.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests