What in the world happened to Wingate 2008??

Use this forum to post questions relating to WinGate, feature requests, technical or configuration problems

Moderator: Qbik Staff

Re: What in the world happened to Wingate 2008??

Postby adrien » Oct 16 08 12:23 am

just an update - still battling that recent issue with the Vista driver, we expect to put a RC into testing tomorrow with a fix for it.
adrien
Qbik Staff
 
Posts: 5448
Joined: Sep 03 03 2:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Re: What in the world happened to Wingate 2008??

Postby sduffey » Oct 16 08 4:16 am

When will HTTP 1.1 be supported?
sduffey
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Jun 16 05 2:22 am

Re: What in the world happened to Wingate 2008??

Postby adrien » Oct 16 08 3:38 pm

Hi

HTTP/1.1 is already mostly supported in 6.x, specifically chunking, and persistent connections, however there were some problems in the DNS resolver that prevented some names e.g. downloads.microsoft.com from resolving properly which may have created a similar problem for windows update.

We've tested windows update and it works fine through 6.5.

What error do you see running Windows Update through your existing WinGate?

Note also, if you have Kaspersky AV for WinGate installed, it removes range request headers - prevents clients from doing partial requests. This prevents the BITS service from working properly I believe. We need to prevent partial requests, else we can't scan the whole file.

so if this applies to you, you need to add the windows update sites as exclusions in Kaspersky AV for WinGate to stop it scanning them, and prevent blocking of range requests.
adrien
Qbik Staff
 
Posts: 5448
Joined: Sep 03 03 2:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Re: What in the world happened to Wingate 2008??

Postby sduffey » Oct 17 08 8:51 am

We dont run Kaspersky. This is what is generated by a WSUS server trying to pull updates behind a Wingate 6.2.2 firewall.

Content file download failed. Reason: The server does not support the necessary HTTP protocol. Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) requires that the server support the Range protocol header.
sduffey
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Jun 16 05 2:22 am

Re: What in the world happened to Wingate 2008??

Postby adrien » Oct 17 08 11:07 am

what about PureSight?

WinGate shouldn't be stripping those range tags out if there are no scanning plugins installed.
adrien
Qbik Staff
 
Posts: 5448
Joined: Sep 03 03 2:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Re: What in the world happened to Wingate 2008??

Postby sduffey » Oct 18 08 9:25 am

We do run Pure Sight.
sduffey
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Jun 16 05 2:22 am

Re: What in the world happened to Wingate 2008??

Postby logan » Oct 20 08 4:48 pm

sduffey wrote:We do run Pure Sight.


In that case you will need to manually classify the Windows update sites as "allowed" so that PureSight does not strip the range header from requests being made to those sites. Here are the steps to classify a site as "allowed" in PureSight.

  1. In the GateKeeper, navigate to Plugins -> Puresight 2.0 for WinGate -> Manual classifications
  2. At the bottom half of this configuration window, select "Any URL containing"
  3. Enter "update.microsoft.com"
  4. Select "Is to be classified as: Allow"
  5. Click "Add"
  6. Enter "download.microsoft.com"
  7. Click "Add"
  8. Enter "windowsupdate.com"
  9. Click "Add"
  10. Click "OK"

Your PureSight plugin will overlook microsoft updates after doing this. Let us know if you have any questions.
logan
Qbik Staff
 
Posts: 671
Joined: Oct 19 06 2:49 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Previous

Return to WinGate

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests